NTIA

Content tagged with "NTIA"

Displaying 1 - 10 of 153

California Tells NTIA: We’ll Take the BEAD Money, Not the Strings

California has agreed to accept its $1.86 billion in federal BEAD funds, but is putting the NTIA on notice that the new conditions being imposed by the Trump administration will not amount to giving up its power to regulate Internet service in the Golden State.

In a Nov. 2 letter accepting the Notice of Award under the BEAD (Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment) program established by the 2021 infrastructure law, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) President John Reynolds said the agency does not read the new federal grant conditions as requiring California to forfeit its legal rights or to stop enforcing state law, and that the CPUC will sign BEAD grant recipient agreements only if and when the state and NTIA resolve its disagreements.

Image
Lady Justice and gavel on a table in a classic law library setting.

At issue is Section 50 of NTIA’s updated grant terms, which would require states to commit not to enforce laws that regulate broadband rates, impose net neutrality, require open access, “or other utility-style rules on broadband internet.”

Data, Drones, and Digital Mascots – Episode 32 of Unbuffered

Unbuffered Logo - Two text bubbles

In this episode of Unbuffered, Chris is joined by Sean Gonsalves and Sascha Meinrath (X-Lab and Penn State University) for a wide-ranging conversation on broadband data, satellite security, and the creeping influence of AI on everyday life.

Together, they start with Vermont’s new VT Speed Check, a partnership with Ookla that asks residents to test early and often as fiber reaches more of the state. Sascha praises the effort but makes the case for open data and open methodologies over proprietary platforms, whose licensing terms can bar researchers from asking hard questions about individual ISPs. 

The group also takes on the federal government’s failure to collect pricing data, the more than $500 million spent on broadband mapping, and an FCC challenge process that lets inaccurate provider claims stand. Chris then argues that today’s higher interest rates are normal rather than extreme, and the panel weighs what that means for municipal fiber and the costs of not building.

Moving to satellite, they discuss reports that Starlink service was cut off for Ukrainian drones and the troubling question of whether one person can degrade military communications. They also cover research linking an ad-tech firm to spyware affecting Starlink devices worldwide, and how big tech scales by eliminating customer service.

Concluding with a What the Tech!? segment, Sean explains “baby schema,” the psychology behind the adorable mascots AI companies use to win trust for agents that need access to your email, calendar, and contacts. 

Sascha describes how mainstream AI tools increasingly restrict access to legal information, why some open-weight models are less restrictive, and how AI customer service has become a war of attrition against users.

This show is 56 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed. 

You can also check out the video version via YouTube.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Whitedrift for the song Operator, licensed Creative Commons Attribution (3.0).

Santa Ynez Chumash Connects First Tribal Fiber Subscribers

The Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians recently reached a major milestone with the launch of the Tribe’s long-awaited Chumash Fiber Network, providing next-gen, affordable broadband access to a California community long-neglected by regional private monopolies.

For generations, telecom giants treated Tribal reservations and rural enclaves across California with predictable neglect: underinvesting in core infrastructure, charging exorbitant rates for slower asymmetrical copper, and insisting low population density makes modern fiber deployment economically unviable.

Like many communities, the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians has taken matters into their own hands with the Chumash Fiber Network, now providing speeds up to five gigabits per second (Gbps) to reservation residents.

Spanning 13 miles of underground fiber across 1,400 acres of ranch land, the network is slated to connect roughly 400 locations — serving an estimated 853 residents — alongside Tribal administrative buildings, health facilities, and the new 143-home Camp 4 residential development.

Funding for the network was provided by Tribal Technical Assistance and federal planning grants via the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program (TBCP), as well as a $4.7 million grant awarded under the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Last Mile Federal Funding Account.

State grant support was coupled with California’s open-access Middle Mile Broadband Initiative (MMBI), which is attempting to give emerging competitors and municipalities a leg-up in a market long-dominated by extractive regional telecom monopolies.

Unlike legacy cable and phone providers that nickel-and-dime captive subscribers with hidden fees, usage limits, and arbitrary speed throttling, the Chumash Fiber Network was engineered as an essential public utility.

Condition 50: The Fine Print Threatening California’s Internet Protections – Episode 30 of Unbuffered

Unbuffered Logo - Two text bubbles

In this episode of Unbuffered, Chris is joined by Chao Jun Liu (Electronic Frontier Foundation) to discuss Condition 50. NTIA added this term to the BEAD program last November. 

It would bar states that accept BEAD funds from enforcing laws that regulate the rates, terms, or conditions of broadband service, including net neutrality, open access, and affordability rules.

Together, they break down what California stands to lose. That includes its landmark 2018 net neutrality law and the $20 low-income plans required as conditions of the Charter-Cox and Verizon-Frontier mergers. 

Chao explains net neutrality’s core protections against blocking, throttling, zero rating, and paid prioritization. She also recounts how Verizon throttled firefighters during a record wildfire in 2018, which helped push California’s law over the finish line.

Moving to the stakes, they weigh roughly $1.4 billion in BEAD deployment funds against a Public Knowledge estimate that Condition 50 could cost California $5 to $16 billion in existing broadband benefits. 

They also cover New York’s decision to sign the agreement despite its Affordable Broadband Act, and how NTIA’s exemption from the Administrative Procedure Act let it add the condition without public comment.

Concluding with the decision facing Governor Newsom ahead of the November 1 deadline, they explore the legal and strategic calculus for a state that has already filed 100 lawsuits against the administration. They also discuss what the outcome could mean for Internet users well beyond California.

This show is 42 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed. 

You can also check out the video version via YouTube.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes (formerly Community Broadband Bits) or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Whitedrift for the song Operator, licensed Creative Commons Attribution (3.0).

Why ISPs Fail and the Reality Facing State Broadband Offices - Episode 29 of Unbuffered

Unbuffered Logo - Two text bubbles

In this episode of Unbuffered, Chris is joined by Doug Dawson (CCG Consulting), Doug Adams (Broadband.io), and Jade Piros de Carvalho (IdeaTek) for a candid, wide-ranging discussion on why new Internet Service Providers stumble and the administrative realities bearing down on state broadband offices.

Together, they break down the common operational traps that derail network builds—from easily overlooked execution details like pouring concrete pads for field huts, to vendor bottlenecks with OSS/BSS software, poor contractor restoration that angers local communities, and the pitfalls of passive marketing. 

Moving behind the scenes of federal policy, the panel tackles the mounting compliance fatigue surrounding the BEAD program, examining high staff turnover in state offices, environmental review delays, pole attachment friction with co-ops, and shifting NTIA timelines.

Concluding with a look at the future of digital infrastructure, the group explores what happens when federal funding programs hit administrative walls and how local, state, and community-driven efforts can maintain momentum to get unserved communities connected.

This show is 52 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed. 

You can also check out the video version via YouTube.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes (formerly Community Broadband Bits) or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Whitedrift for the song Operator, licensed Creative Commons Attribution (3.0).

The FWA Reality Check and the BEAD Final Numbers - Episode 25 of Unbuffered

Unbuffered Logo - Two text bubbles

In this episode of Unbuffered, Chris is joined again by Doug Dawson of CCG Consulting for a wide-ranging conversation about fixed wireless access performance, federal broadband definitions, the BEAD program's true-up process, and the potential impact of artificial intelligence on network infrastructure.

Chris and Doug begin by diving into a recent Ookla report on Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) from AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. They break down how FWA operates on de-prioritized cellular capacity, why seasonal foliage can slow down speeds, and how the limitations of upload performance highlight the stark difference between cellular home broadband and wireline fiber connections.

From there, the conversation turns to federal policy and mapping challenges. Chris and Doug critique potential shifts at the FCC regarding broadband speed definitions and discuss a GAO report highlighting the hurdles local governments and Tribal nations faced during the bulk broadband collection challenge process. They also examine the NTIA’s plan for truing up unserved locations under the BEAD program, as well as the final funding distributions across fiber, Low Earth Orbit satellites, and fixed wireless networks.

Finally, Chris and Doug tackle the popular debate around AI and network congestion. They unpack why data center traffic differs from residential internet usage, address the security and infrastructural risks of rapid AI development, and discuss the long-term economic viability of major AI models.

Throughout the episode, Chris and Doug connect these technical and policy developments to broader questions about network reliability, federal oversight, market competition, and who will ultimately build and control the future of telecommunications.

This show is 46 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed. 

You can also check out the video version via YouTube.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes (formerly Community Broadband Bits) or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Whitedrift for the song Operator, licensed Creative Commons Attribution (3.0).

Federal Agencies Still Can't Get Their Broadband Data Straight, GAO Finds

A recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report reveals what’s been obvious to broadband deployment experts for years now: the federal government’s multi-agency approach to closing the digital divide is undermined by a lack of coordination and data-management among agencies.

The result is an FCC broadband coverage map with an amalgamation of inaccuracies that misrepresents where high-speed Internet service does or does not exist, a flaw that can steer taxpayer dollars away from communities that actually need them.

Since 2020, four federal agencies — the FCC, NTIA, USDA and Treasury — have been administering nine different grant programs to build-out new Internet networks in unserved and underserved areas across the nation, including the $42.5 billion federal flagship BEAD (Broadband Equity Access and Deployment) program.

As ILSR’s Senior GIS Analyst Christine Parker notes, the report devotes considerable attention to “de-duplication” — the process of cross-referencing which locations have already received funding or service commitments from one program so that other programs don't waste money doubling up, or worse, leave locations out entirely because it was wrongly assumed to be covered elsewhere.

Image
GAO sign and building in background

“But there’s no documented process or timeline for actually doing this,” Parker says.

Garbage In, Garbage Out

Part of the problem, the report notes, is that agencies track and report funding data in different formats, with some programs collecting far more granular location-level detail than others so that it is much harder to reconcile the datasets and match them up. GAO indicates the agencies are aware of the issue and are working to reconcile it, but as of the report’s release, no consistent process was in place.

Can't See the Sky for the Trees: Obstruction Could Plague Ohio’s Planned Starlink BEAD Plan

Researchers say they’re concerned that a massive influx of new federal grant money being redirected to Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite broadband company in Ohio will be thwarted by the simple fact that many targeted locations don’t have a clear, unobstructed view of the sky.

Tom Reid of Reid Consulting conducted a study earlier this year taking a closer look at the 30,000 locations in Ohio that are poised to receive subsidized service from Starlink, and found that as many as 70 percent of the target locations were covered by tree canopy preventing the minimum 110-degree field of view Starlink dishes require.

“Only about 30 percent of the households awarded in the state of Ohio have a clear enough view of the sky to get a good, stable Starlink signal,” Reid recently told local Ohio public media.

Ohio is slated to receive $793 million in federal Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) grants to fund fiber expansion. But after the Trump NTIA last year changed the program to benefit Elon Musk, Starlink quickly became the biggest state beneficiary of public tax money, receiving more than $51.6 million in grants.

The Trump administration’s changes not only eliminated affordability and equitable deployment requirements, they directed millions of dollars away from higher-capacity future-proof fiber, and toward the back pocket of a billionaire who had already planned to deploy the LEO satellite network without subsidization.

‘Not Living in the Cloud’: Hoopa Valley Tribe Builds Digital Sovereignty With New Network Hub

The Hoopa Valley Tribe is celebrating the opening of its new fiber network operations center as the Hoopa Valley Public Utilities District (HVPUD) expands fiber-to-the-home Internet service throughout the Hoopa Valley Reservation and into neighboring communities just outside of its Tribal lands.

To mark the occasion earlier this summer, more than 50 community members, Tribal leaders, HVPUD staff, and project partners attended the July 17 opening celebration.

At the celebration, Hoopa Valley Tribal Vice Chairman Jordan Hailey hailed the milestone moment:

“This is truly a great day for the Hoopa Valley Tribe, for the department and for the Hoopa people. It makes me proud as a Hoopa Tribal member and a member of this community to see everything that they’ve accomplished.”

Though the new network operations headquarters is a storage and transport data center, General Manager of HVPUD Linnea Jackson made it clear that it is not a hyperscale/compute AI data center that have sparked controversy and protest in numerous local communities across the nation.

“The (data centers) that are sucking up all those resources — water, land, and energy — those are the AI data centers. Ours is a network hub, not a huge footprint,” Jackson tells ILSR. “We’re talking about servers and rack space for (Tribal) government operations and records, not a demand on our water resources — completely different from a large AI data center.”

Image
Three Hoopa Valley PUD fiber techs stand at the end of a row of black server racks

Establishing Data Sovereignty

Too Easy to Reach Orbit? - Episode 16 of Unbuffered

Unbuffered Logo - Two text bubbles

In this episode of Unbuffered, Chris is joined again by Douglas Dawson for a conversation about the challenges and opportunities shaping the future of broadband.

Chris and Doug begin by discussing the latest developments in the National Digital Inclusion Alliance's lawsuit against the Trump administration over the Digital Equity Act, examining what the case could mean for digital equity efforts and the communities working to expand access, affordability, and digital skills.

From there, they turn to the results of a recent survey examining how rural Americans use the Internet, exploring what it reveals about changing consumer habits, growing bandwidth demands, and the ways AI and other emerging technologies are reshaping how people connect online.

The conversation then shifts to the practical realities of building broadband networks, including the rising cost of Fiber construction, permitting delays, make-ready work, and why better pole inventories could significantly reduce deployment costs and speed up network expansion.

Chris and Doug also take a closer look at the Federal Communications Commission's evolving approach to satellite broadband, discussing recent regulatory changes, what they could mean for the industry, and whether the agency's approach strikes the right balance as more companies look to launch satellite broadband services. They also explore how satellite fits alongside Fiber and other technologies as communities work to expand reliable Internet access.

Throughout the episode, Chris and Doug connect today's policy debates with broader questions about technology, infrastructure, and what it will take to ensure communities have reliable, affordable Internet in the years ahead.

This show is 48 minutes long and can be played on this page or via Apple Podcasts or the tool of your choice using this feed. 

You can also check out the video version via YouTube.

Transcript below.

We want your feedback and suggestions for the show-please e-mail us or leave a comment below.

Listen to other episodes (formerly Community Broadband Bits) or view all episodes in our index. See other podcasts from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Thanks to Whitedrift for the song Operator, licensed Creative Commons Attribution (3.0).